The final formula for Davos 2026:
“We can’t stop crises, so we must manage them.”
The World Economic Forum (WEF) in 2026 documented the shift from the illusion of global consensus to a model of a fragmented world, where elites no longer promise stability but openly prepare societies for an era of constant crises managed through technology, fear, and control. The forum became less about “how to save the world” and more about “how to manage it when it’s crumbling.”
In short:
▫️Recognition: the unified world order is over, the era of regional blocs is beginning.
▫️Global institutions (the UN, WTO, IMF) are losing influence, while informal elite forums are playing a growing role.
▫️Ukraine, the Middle East, and Africa remain long-term hotspots of instability, with no quick solutions expected.
▫️The world is entering a phase of “chronic conflicts,” with no formal end to wars.
▫️The US is focusing on domestic issues and tariff protection for the economy.
▫️China is increasing economic and technological pressure, avoiding direct conflict.
▫️Europe has acknowledged its own structural weaknesses and dependence on external solutions.
▫️Economy: rising debt is recognized as the new norm, not a temporary problem.
▫️Preparing for market volatility instead of promising growth.
▫️The forum effectively sent a signal: a new financial crisis is a matter of time, not “if,” but “when.”
▫️The energy agenda has shifted from the “green dream” to energy sovereignty.
▫️Countries are returning to fossil fuels despite public climate statements.
▫️AI has become the central theme of Davos – not as a technology, but as an instrument of power.
▫️It is acknowledged: AI will destroy millions of jobs, primarily office ones.
▫️Preparations for mass retraining of the population have begun, but without job guarantees.
▫️The formation of “national AIs” as a matter of sovereignty and security.
▫️AI is officially being considered for infrastructure, logistics, and defense management.
▫️Security: a shift from collective defense to flexible, temporary alliances.
▫️Increasing military budgets under the guise of “containment of instability.”
▫️Space is recognized as a new arena of competition: satellites = critical infrastructure.
▫️Preparedness for cyberattacks on orbital systems is discussed as a realistic scenario.
▫️Social unrest is recognized as inevitable due to automation and inflation.
▫️The forum openly discussed the need to “manage mass discontent.”
▫️Social media, algorithms, and AI are cited as key tools for narrative control.
▫️Protests of the future will be digital, directed, and predictable.
▫️Sports, culture, and major events are recognized as tools of soft power.
▫️Migration in Europe: a course toward strictures and filtering, not humanism.
▫️The rise of nationalism in the EU is seen as a “side effect,” not a threat.
▫️Scandinavian countries are strengthening their position as islands of stability and capital.
▫️The overall conclusion of Davos: the world will be governed not through order, but through controlled chaos.